Skip navigation |

Meta-analysis and meta-regression

Full Title: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in functional somatic disorders.

Authors: Tak LM, Cleare AJ, Ormel J, Manoharan A, Kok IC, Wessely S, Rosmalen JG.

Publication: Biological Psychology

Publication Date: 9th February 2010

Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Dimence Institute of Mental Health, Deventer, the Netherlands.

Abstract
Dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the most investigated biological risk marker in functional somatic disorders (FSD), such as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aim was to assess whether there is an association between basal hypocortisolism and FSD and to identify potential moderators of this association. Meta-analysis on eighty-five studies revealed that although basal cortisol levels were generally lower in FSD subjects compared to controls, this association did not reach statistical significance (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.04, p=0.241). However, when the three FSD were assessed separately, statistically significant basal hypocortisolism was observed in CFS subjects compared to controls (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.00, p=0.047), but not in FM or IBS. When all potential moderators were entered into a meta-regression analysis, only type of FSD and female gender were significant independent predictors of basal hypocortisolism. In conclusion, we did not find evidence to consider all three main FSD as hypocortisolemic disorders, as significant reduction in basal cortisol compared to healthy controls was only found in CFS and in females with FM, but not in IBS.

PMID: 21315796

View the 'Meta-analysis and meta-regression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in functional somatic disorders' abstract in PubMed.

1 comment

More biochemical meta-analyses needed
I am pleased to see that at least one biochemically-based meta-analysis relevant to M.E./CFS has been carried out.

There seems to be a serious dearth of such studies. A quick search of the M.E. Research site, HighWire and BioMedCentral only found meta-analyses on cognitive aspects, exercise, acupuncture and studies which included genetic data.

The M.E. Research file of abstracts from 1956-2010 is 1333 pages long and includes a lot of biochemical and clinical findings. A meta-analysis of such studies would seem to promise useful findings on which to base further trials and expedite rational decisions of effective treatments.
Vivien 1 from Launceston, Cornwall, 22 February 2012 19:26
 

Back to top

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Action for M.E. website. To find out more about the cookies, see our privacy policy.