For healthcare professionals

A A A Text size


As there is no specific single test to detect M.E., diagnosis is made after other possible known causes for symptoms have been excluded. This should be a positive clinical diagnosis made on a well-characterised constellation of symptoms.

Our Newly diagnosed with M.E./CFS booklet is endorsed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and provides information and advice about the diagnosis, symptoms and management of M.E. There is also guidance to help patients be an active partner in their own care, suggestions for questions to ask GPs, and information about existing guidelines for health professionals. We advise all healthcare professionals who need information on M.E. to begin by downloading and reading this free resource.

A collaboration of clinicians, patients and charities, including Action for M.E. and the Medical Education working group of the UK CFS/M.E. Research Collaborative, led by Dr Nina Muirhead, launched a short, CPD-accredited module on M.E. in May 2020. This free online resource is composed of 10 clinical cases assessing your knowledge of M.E., and is available at Study PRN. It's complemented by our Learn about M.E. podcast, with input from patients Anna and Craig, about the positive difference that good care and support has made for them, alongside insight from Dr Muirhead and GP Claire Wood.

Dr Muirhead also contributed to one of a series of insightful films by Dialogues for ME/CFS, a Wellcome Public Engagement Award-winner, which you can watch below.

The NICE guideline for M.E. (undergoing essential updates, with a new guideline expected August 2021) and the Scottish Good Practice Statement on M.E. detail the signs and symptoms that characterise M.E., and tests that should be undertaken. Diagnosis should be made after other possible diagnoses have been excluded and the symptoms have persisted for four months in an adult or three months in a child or young person. M.E. “should be reconsidered if none of the following key features are present:

  • post-exertional fatigue or malaise
  • cognitive difficulties
  • sleep disturbance
  • chronic pain.”

The draft NICE guideline for M.E. emphasises that specific considerations/advice must be followed for people with severe or very severe M.E.; and for children and young people. It also says that any plan put in place to support the person with M.E. (eg. symptom management plan) must be tailored to the individual, by the individual, with appropriate support from a professional with experience of M.E. if needed/wanted.

Following a last-minute pause to its planned August publication, NICE has confirmed that its 2021 guideline for M.E. will be published w/c Monday 25 October. We will update our online information about the guideline as soon as possible.

Because we don’t yet understand the biology of M.E., there are no targeted treatments that work for the majority. This differentiates M.E. from other conditions where better understood biomarkers can offer clearer treatment pathways and protocols. So a treatment approach that one patient finds effective may or may not have a different impact on someone else with the illness.

Action for M.E.’s 2019 Big Survey found that:

  • 12% of people with M.E. had been symptomatic for three years or less
  • 27% for four years to nine years
  • 61% for 10 years or more.

Results also indicated that, despite the NICE guideline for M.E. stating that symptoms should be present for four months before diagnosis is made, a significant number of people with M.E. wait much longer, potentially delaying access to specialist care and support. Our survey found that:

  • roughly 28% of adults are receiving a diagnosis after four months.
  • 45% of people are waiting more than a year.


The prognosis varies, possibly because of sub-types or phenotypes, and different definitions of recovery. A Chief Medical Officer’s report published in 2002 concluded that most patients show improvement over time, a substantial number have a fluctuating course of illness with periods of remission and relapse, but that a significant minority become severely ill and permanently disabled.

A review of published studies reported recovery rates of 8–63% (median 40%), with full recovery being rare (5–10% achieving total remission). The prognosis in children and young people is more optimistic.